Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 27
Filter
1.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(3): 41, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2110634

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) pandemic has been an unceasing plight with a wide range of clinical presentations. The direct effects of the virus, increased use of medications, and lifestyle changes have contributed to the vulnerability to co-infections. Fungal and bacterial co-infections led to increased morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. Similarly, the surge of skin signs in conjunction with herpes zoster (HZ) manifestations has been reported. In this study, we pooled the data on the clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 patients co-infected with HZ. METHODOLOGY: Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were extensively searched to identify the relevant studies on HZ infection among the SARS-CoV-2 patients. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients (from case reports, series, and retrospective studies) were included in the analysis. Fever was the most common constitutional symptom recorded, followed by cough and dyspnea. A systemic rash was reported in 78.5% of cases with mild symptoms of HZ and SARS-CoV-2 in 87% and 76%, respectively. Only 19% of the cases presented during the prodrome period of SARS-CoV-2. HZV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in 8.9% of the cases, and the remaining were diagnosed clinically. SARS-CoV-2 PCR was reported positive in 65 cases (82.3%). Leukopenia was observed in 7 cases (8.9%) and lymphopenia in 25 (31.6%). All patients recovered through conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 escalated the incidence of HZ reactivation. Most of the patients were seen with older individuals either simultaneously or a few days after the SARS-CoV-2 infection, but a few cases were reported during the asymptomatic prodrome period of SARS-CoV-2.

2.
Qatar medical journal ; 2022(3), 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2046871

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) pandemic has been an unceasing plight with a wide range of clinical presentations. The direct effects of the virus, increased use of medications, and lifestyle changes have contributed to the vulnerability to co-infections. Fungal and bacterial co-infections led to increased morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. Similarly, the surge of skin signs in conjunction with herpes zoster (HZ) manifestations has been reported. In this study, we pooled the data on the clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 patients co-infected with HZ. Methodology: Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were extensively searched to identify the relevant studies on HZ infection among the SARS-CoV-2 patients. Results: A total of 79 patients (from case reports, series, and retrospective studies) were included in the analysis. Fever was the most common constitutional symptom recorded, followed by cough and dyspnea. A systemic rash was reported in 78.5% of cases with mild symptoms of HZ and SARS-CoV-2 in 87% and 76%, respectively. Only 19% of the cases presented during the prodrome period of SARS-CoV-2. HZV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive in 8.9% of the cases, and the remaining were diagnosed clinically. SARS-CoV-2 PCR was reported positive in 65 cases (82.3%). Leukopenia was observed in 7 cases (8.9%) and lymphopenia in 25 (31.6%). All patients recovered through conservative treatment. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 escalated the incidence of HZ reactivation. Most of the patients were seen with older individuals either simultaneously or a few days after the SARS-CoV-2 infection, but a few cases were reported during the asymptomatic prodrome period of SARS-CoV-2

3.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 32(9): 1191-1195, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2026430

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare complete blood count and biochemistry parameters such as c-reactive protein/albumin (CRP/ALB) ratio, procalcitonin/albumin (PRO/ALB) ratio, lymphocyte/monocyte (LYM/MON) ratio, platelet/lymphocyte (PLT/LYM) ratio of the recovered/deceased, and ICU (intensive care unit) /ward patients with COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Internal Medicine, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Turkey, from April 2020 to January 2021. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted with 590 diagnosed patients with COVID-19. The patients were divided into 2 groups as deceased (n = 294) /survivor (n = 296) and those in need of ICU (n= 418) /ward (n = 172). The information was obtained from the hospital information system and analysed retrospectively. The relationships of crp/alb, pro/alb, lym/mon, and PLT/LYM ratios with patient groups were investigated. RESULTS: Of the total 590 patients in the study, 358 (60.6%) were males. The total mean age was 65.63 ±14.9 years. The mean age of survivor and deceased groups was 71.32±10.9 and 59.97±16.2 years, respectively (p.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Procalcitonin , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Female , Humans , Lymphocytes , Male , Middle Aged , Monocytes/chemistry , Retrospective Studies
5.
Saudi J Biol Sci ; 29(6): 103274, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1757829

ABSTRACT

Recent worldwide outbreak of SARS-COV-2 pandemic has increased the thirst to discover and introduce antiviral drugs to combat it. The bioactive compounds from plant sources, especially terpenoid have protease inhibition activities so these may be much effective for the control of viral epidemics and may reduce the burden on health care system worldwide. Present study aims the use of terpenoid from selected plant source through bioinformatics tools for the inhibition of SARS-COV-2. This study is based on descriptive analysis. The Protein Data Bank and PubChem database were used for the analysis of SARS-COV-2 protease and plant source terpenoids. Molecular docking by using molegro virtual docker (MVD) software was carried out. The findings of study are based on the inhibitory actions of different plant sourced terpenoid against SARS-COV-2. As per the available resources and complementary analysis these phytochemicals have capacity to inhibit 3CLpro protease. The study reports that (3,3-dimethylally) isoflavone (Glycine max), licoleafol (Glycyrrhiza uralensis), myricitrin (Myrica cerifera), thymoquinone (Nigella sativa), bilobalide, ginkgolide A (Ginkgo biloba), Salvinorin A (Salvia divinorum), citral (Backhousia citriodora) and prephenazine (drug) showed high activity against SARS-COV-2 protease 3CLpro. The drug like and ADMET properties revealed that these compounds can safely be used as drugs. Cross structural analysis by using bioinformatics study concludes that these plant source terpenoid compounds can be effectively used as antiprotease drugs for SARS-COV-2 in future.

6.
J Med Virol ; 94(7): 3176-3183, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1739188

ABSTRACT

The efficacy of the inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine has not been fully elucidated across the whole spectrum of patients on kidney replacement therapy. We aimed to characterize the long-term antibody response of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administered in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. We performed this prospective observational study in 50 HD, 64 KTR, and 41 healthy control groups (HG) given two doses of CoronaVac. We measured anti-Spike antibodies after 28 days of every vaccine dose, 3rd and 6th months after the first dose, and compared them between cohorts. After two doses, an anti-spike immunoglobulin G of ≥50 AU/ml was present in HD, KTR, and HG as 44%, 7.2%, and 58.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the proportion of antibody titers peaked at 86.5%, 23%, and 97.6% (p < 0.001) at the 3rd month and decreased significantly at the 6th month in most HD and HG participants, whereas this effect was not observed in KTRs from basal until the 6th month (p < 0.001). During the follow-up, the incidence of coronavirus disease 2019 disease was higher (p < 0.003) in KTRs compared to the other groups, but there was no requirement for an intensive care unit and no death was recorded. We found a negative correlation between antibody seroconversion and age (p < 0.016). The antibody response following inactivated vaccine in dialysis patients is almost comparable to controls for 6 months. In contrast, kidney transplant patients have a poor response. These findings reinforce the need to discuss the vaccination strategy in immunocompromised patients, including the third dose with homologous or heterologous vaccines.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Antibodies, Viral , Antibody Formation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Renal Dialysis , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Cureus ; 13(11): e19487, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1538807

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study was conducted to determine whether remdesivir administration for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with reducing deaths among COVID-19 hospitalized patients. METHODOLOGY: It was a retrospective study, and the data was acquired at Ziauddin Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. All patients admitted between February and May 2021 with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction testing from nasopharyngeal samples were included in the study, including those who received at least five-day treatment of remdesivir and who did not receive even a single dose of remdesivir. RESULTS: Data of overall 174 patients were used, out of which 71 (40.80%) received remdesivir. After propensity score matching, 71 patients in the remdesivir group were successfully matched with the non-remdesivir patients on the basis of age, gender, and disease severity. Results of multivariable logistic regression showed that there is no significant difference in deaths between patients who received remdesivir and patients who did not receive remdesivir (p-value=0.122). However, the length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the remdesivir group than in the control group (p-value=0.001). CONCLUSION: Results of this study can provide evidence that remdesivir can be efficient in reducing the duration of COVID-19 illness, and a five-day course of treatment is sufficient for patients to get clinical benefits.

8.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol ; 8(1)2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1476450

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 pandemic has globally affected healthcare including the transplantation programmes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied the impact of COVID-19 on live liver donor (LLD) programme at liver transplant centre in Gambat, Pakistan. Standard operative procedures (SOPs) including COVID-19 nasopharyngeal swab PCR, CT scans, personal protective equipment use, 6-feet distancing were developed for LLD and transplant team to mitigate COVID-19 exposure. We compared the complications, healthcare utilisation (hospital stay, readmission) and mortality between two LLD cohorts-before and during COVID-19 pandemic from March 2019 to December 2020. RESULTS: During study period 300 LLD surgeries were performed. There was an increase in rate of LLDs from 132 (44%) in pre-COVID to 168 (56%) during COVID-19 era. Average numbers of transplants per month performed during pre-COVID and during COVID-19 era were 10.1 and 14, respectively. No donor has developed COVID-19 infection during hospitalisation. Rate of all LLD complications (32 (21.47%) and 49 (29.16%), p=0.43), uneventful discharges (120/168 (71.4%) and 88/132 (66.6%), p<0.05), mean hospital stay (6±2 days and 5±2 days, p=0.17) and readmission (5 (4%) and 3 (1.8%), p=0.43) were similar during the pre-COVID and COVID-19 era. No donor mortality was observed during study period. CONCLUSION: With the implementation of mindful SOPs, rate of LLD increased without any case of COVID-19 infection. Our SOPs were helpful in continuation of LLD programme in a developing country during COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Liver , Living Donors , Pakistan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 67Suppl 1(Suppl 1): 80-85, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1362148

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study compares the cardiac parameters of the survivor and nonsurvivor patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This study was conducted in 379 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 disease. Information of 21 nonsurvivor and 358 survivor patients with COVID-19 was obtained from the hospital information management system and analyzed retrospectively. Relationship between cardiac parameters in patients categorized into the mortal and immortal groups was investigated. RESULTS: Of the total 379 patients involved in this study, 155 (40.9%) were females and 224 (59.1%) were males. No statistically significant difference in mortality was found between females and males (p=0.249). The total median age was 70, the median age in the nonsurvivor group was 74 (35-89), and it was 69.5 (18-96) in the survivor group (p=0.249). The median values of high-sensitivity troponin (hs-Tn), creatine kinase MB form, and especially myoglobin in the survivor and nonsurvivor groups were 25/64.9 (p=0.028), 18/23 (p=0.02), and 105.5/322.4 (p<0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. Comparing mortality, while there was 1 (0.7%) nonsurvivor out of 134 patients in the service unit, there were 20 (8.2%) nonsurvivors out of 245 patients in the intensive care unit. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.003). The cutoff value of myoglobin, which may pose a risk of mortality, was found to be 191.4 µg/L, while it was 45.7 ng/l for hs-Tn and 60.1 U/L for creatine kinase MB. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age and increased levels of high-sensitivity troponin, creatine kinase MB, and myoglobin were found to be associated with mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers , Creatine Kinase , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Survivors
10.
Cureus ; 13(7): e16598, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1348773

ABSTRACT

Background Blood groups are considered to have an impact on the occurrence and severity of coronavirus disease. While among Chinese and Caucasian, blood group O individuals were less and group A were more likely to have severe disease and mortality, data on South Asians aren't available.  Objective This study aimed to find out the association of disease severity with blood group among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Materials and methodology Data were collected on a predesigned questionnaire containing details of patient demographics, medical comorbidities, clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the association of the blood group with the severity of coronavirus disease. Result Among the study participants, blood group B has the highest distribution (39.8%), followed by O (30.0), A (21.9%), and AB (8.1%). About three-fourths (69.9%) had mild to moderate disease while 30.0% had severe disease. Age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hemoglobin level were all associated with disease severity among COVID-19 patients in univariate analysis on P-value for selection (<0.25). The final model showed that the odds of disease severity is 3.62 times higher among males (OR: 3.62, 95% CI: 2.15-6.08) and 2.00 times higher among diabetic patients (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.10-3.01) as compared to female and non-diabetic respectively. However, there was no significant association found between blood group and disease severity. Conclusion Blood groups don't have any role in forecasting the severity of coronavirus disease. However, the male gender and diabetics are prone to have severe disease.

11.
authorea preprints; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.162858109.90013758.v1

ABSTRACT

Objective: No effective treatment has yet been found for SARS-cov-2, which caused a pandemic outbreak in 2019. It is crucial to detect the progression of Covid-19 in patients as early as possible. Fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) has been used as a new inflammatory marker. We aimed to find out whether the use of the FAR ratio as a predictor of mortality in Covid-19 patients provides clinical benefit. Materials and Methods: Data from 590 patients with Covid-19 from 15/03/2020 to 15/01/2021 in medicine wards and intensive care units (ICU) were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data and other laboratory markers were collected from the electronic medical records. Relationship between FAR ratio was investigated between patients in the survivor/non-survivor patients. Findings: The mean FAR levels in patients who were non survivor was 24.44±30.3 (n:272 and 11.29±6.29 (n:275) (p:0.000) in patients survivor COVID-19 infection. In ROC curve for FAR, the threshold FAR that may pose a risk for mortality was determined as 13.84 ((AUC: 0.808(0.771-0.844)); 74.9% Sensitivity, 74.6% Specificity; p:0.000 )). Result: As a result of this study, increased FAR were found to be important markers in determining the mortality levels in Covid-19 patients. What is already known about FAR ratio: The fibrinogen albumin ratio is a value that has been used to determine the prognosis, especially in malignancies. [32] In a recent study 91 Covid-19 patients were analyzed 22 patients with severe disease higher FAR ratio compare to mild disaese [36] What does this article add about FAR ratio in Covid-19 patients: It has been concluded that the FAR ratio, which is used in diseases such as malignancy, hypertension, and coronary syndrome as a marker of disease progression, can be used as a mortality indicator in Covid-19


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronary Aneurysm , Hypertension, Malignant
12.
authorea preprints; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.162704120.08475182.v1

ABSTRACT

Objective: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist that is increasingly used in the daily practice of intensive care units (ICUs) with its sedative, analgesic, anxiolytic, and immunoprotective effects. In this study, we aimed to analyze whether Dexmedetomidine improves the outcomes in patients treated in ICU. Design: A retrospective study Place and Duration of Study: Intensive care units (ICU) of Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey, from October 2020 to February 2021 Methodology: The medical records of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. We included 134 patients in the study, in 45 of whom the treatment regimen included dexmedetomidine and 89 of whom were not treated with dexmedetomidine. Patients treated with DEX were defined as the “patient group”, whereas patients not treated with DEX were defined as “control group” and the parameters were compared between these groups. Obtained data were analyzed in the biostatistical program. Results: The median age of all patients was 64 and 62.7% of them were male. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of median ages (p>0.05). The patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), congestive heart failure (CHF), and undergoing insulin treatment were significantly less treated with DEX (p=0.04, p=0.03, and p=0.016 respectively) whereas intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy was found to be more frequently applied to the patient group (p=0.043). The median duration between ICU admission and the time of intubation was 4 days for the control group whereas it was 1 day for the patient group and the difference was strongly significant (p=0.000, p<0.001). The other analyses concerning lab parameters, mortality rates, intubation rates and durations, applied treatments, and comorbidities revealed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion: Our study revealed that DEX therapy can help us to gain time before intubation however can not reduce mortality rates in severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Heart Failure , Diabetes Mellitus , Affective Disorders, Psychotic
13.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 31(7): S99-S103, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1317396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether prealbumin could be a new biomarker for predicting mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. STUDY DESIGN: An observation study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Intensive care units (ICU) of Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey, from October 2020 to December 2020. METHODOLOGY: The data of 149 patients, who were admitted to the ICU were collected and analysed retrospectively. Routine blood samples were collected from all patients at the time of admission to the ICU; and 102 patients with the mortal course and 47 patients with the non-mortal course were included in the study. The data obtained from these patients were analyzed in the biostatistics programme.  Results: The median age of all patients was 68 years; while 94 of them were males (63.1%) and 55 of them were females (36.9%). Median levels of potassium (K) (p=0.04), uric acid (p=0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (p=0.004), and procalcitonin (PCT) (p<0.001) were significantly higher and median level of prealbumin (p=0.002) was significantly lower in the deceased group. The cut-off level of prealbumin for mortality was found as 0.085 g/L (p=0.002). Further analysis revealed that the risk of mortality was found as 2.193 times more in patients with prealbumin levels of <0.085 g/L (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.193, 95% CI: 1.084-4.434). CONCLUSION: As a result of this study, it was found that patients with lower levels of prealbumin at the time of admission to the ICU have a higher risk for mortality. It was showed that prealbumin can be a useful biomarker for predicting mortality in patients with severe COVID-19. Key Words: Prealbumin, COVID-19, Mortality, Prognostic biomarkers, Severe disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Prealbumin , Aged , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Prealbumin/analysis , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Turkey/epidemiology
14.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(3): 398-403, 2021 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1175616

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to investigate whether macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) predicts the prognosis of COVID-19 disease. METHODOLOGY: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted on 87 confirmed COVID-19 patients. The patients were separated into two groups according to the admission in the ICU or in the ward. MIF was determined batchwise in plasma obtained as soon as the patients were admitted. Both groups were compared with respect to demographic characteristics, biochemical parameters and prediction of requirement to ICU admission. RESULTS: Forty seven patients in ICU, and 40 patients in ward were included. With respect to MIF levels and biochemical biomarkers, there was a statistically significant difference between the ICU and ward patients (p< 0.024). In terms of ICU requirement, the cut-off value of MIF was detected as 4.705 (AUC:0.633, 95%CI:0.561-0.79, p= 0.037), D-dimer was 789 (AUC:0.779, 95%CI: 0.681-0.877, p= 0.000), troponin was 8.15 (AUC: 0.820, 95%CI:0.729-0.911, p= 0.000), ferritin was 375 (AUC: 0.774, 95%CI:0.671-0.876, p= 0.000), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 359.5 (AUC:0.843, 95%CI: 0.753-0.933, p= 0.000). According to the logistic regression analysis; when MIF level > 4.705, the patient's requirement to ICU risk was increased to 8.33 (95%CI: 1.73-44.26, p= 0.009) fold. Similarly, elevation of troponin, ferritin and, LDH was shown to predict disease prognosis (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that MIF may play a role in inflammatory responses to COVID-19 through induction of pulmonary inflammatory cytokines, suggesting that pharmacotherapeutic approaches targeting MIF may hold promise for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/immunology , Inflammation/blood , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Intramolecular Oxidoreductases/blood , Macrophage Migration-Inhibitory Factors/blood , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inflammation/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Qualitative Research , ROC Curve
15.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 37(1): 36-41, 2022 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1171646

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the experiences and preferences of ophthalmology residency applicants and program directors (PDs), with emphasis on the effect of COVID-19 as well as recent changes on the application process. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, online survey. PARTICIPANTS: All applicants to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute ophthalmology residency program, and all United States ophthalmology residency PDs, during the 2020-2021 application cycle. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to applicants and program directors of the 2020-2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle.Main Outcome Measures: Applicant demographics, application submissions, interview experiences, financial considerations, match results, and suggestions for improvement of the application process. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 205 applicants (34.9% response rate) and 37 PDs (30.3%). A successful match into an ophthalmology residency was achieved by 144 (83.7%) applicants. Applicants applied to (mean ± SD) 79.7 ± 22.8 ophthalmology residency programs, received 13.1 ± 8.9 invitations to interview, and attended 11.1 ± 5.8 interviews. Most applicants (N = 126; 71.2%) and PDs (N = 22; 78.6%) expressed a preference for in-person interviews over virtual interviews. If given a choice regarding the future direction for interviews, most applicants were unsure (N = 68; 38.4%) or would prefer to hold interviews virtually (N = 62; 35.0%); PDs felt that interviews should go back to being in-person (39.3%) or were unsure (28.6%). Most PDs (N = 21; 72.4%) reported an increased number of applications received by their respective programs this year compared to previous years. While applicants (N = 108; 61.0%) mostly felt that there should not be a cap on the number of applications, 19 (67.9%) PDs supported a limit on application numbers. Applicants spent an average (SD) of $2320.96 ($1172.86) on the application process this year, which is significantly less than 2018-2019 data. CONCLUSIONS: The ophthalmology residency application process was especially complex during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many applicants and PDs were glad that interviews were held virtually this year, they were less certain regarding future years. The virtual format led to a significantly lower financial burden for applicants and may lead some to prefer this format in the future; if a hybrid model is offered for virtual/in-person interviews, these two interview modes should be compared equally.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Ophthalmology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United States
16.
authorea preprints; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.161278147.79863996.v1

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to measure plasma midkine levels in patients with COVID-19 and to assess its clinical significance. Material and Method: 88 patients followed in our hospital with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory data of the patients were recorded, and the relationship between midkine level and prognosis and other parameters were investigated. Results: Of the 88 patients included in the study, 43 (48.9%) were female and 45 (51.1%) were male. 24 (27%) of our cases were died. The mean age of non-survivals was 70 ± 12.3 and the survivals were 61.9 ± 18.2 years. Mortality predictors due to COVID-19 in group 2 patients were significantly higher than those in group 2 (p <0.05). The median (IR) value of the MK level was 152.5±125 pg/ml in all patients, 143±149 pg/ml in survivors and 165.5±76 pg/ml in those who died (p= 0.546). The difference between these two groups compared according to mortality was not statistically significant The area under the ROC curve was found to be 0.542 (95% CI 0.423-0.661, p= 0.546). Conclusion: MK is not a biomarker that can reinforce known predictors of mortality in COVID-19 patients and can provide better predictions of mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
17.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66Suppl 2(Suppl 2): 86-90, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1044797

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic significance of ABO and Rh blood group antigens along with various parameters in patients followed-up with the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS: We evaluated 397 patients who were follow-up and treated due to COVID-19 infections. The ages, genders, chronic diseases, ABO and Rh blood group antigens, admission rates to Intensive Care Units (ICU), and mortality rates of the patients were analyzed. FINDINGS: The mean age of the 397 patients with COVID-19 was 47±17 years. In the blood group analysis of the patients, A Rh-positive (A +) was the most frequently seen blood type (176 patients, 44.3%) followed by O Rh-positive (0 +) (109 patients, 27,5%); 38 patients were Rh negative (Rh -) (9,6%). 53 of the patients (13,4%) were followed in ICU and 29 patients died (7,3%). Neither mortality nor admission to ICU was seen for Rh - group. The comparison of Rh groups concerning the need for ICU admission revealed a significantly high rate of ICU admission in the Rh + group (p=0,011), while no significant relationship was found between mortality and Rh antigen (p=0,069). CONCLUSION: The most frequently seen blood type among COVID-19 patients was A +. The Rh + blood group was found in all cases who were admitted to ICU and had a death outcome. The Rh + blood group was found in a significantly high number of patients who were admitted to ICU, while no significant relationship was found between mortality and Rh blood group.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Blood Group Antigens , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Adult , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , SARS-CoV-2
18.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(Suppl 2):65-70, 2020.
Article in English | LILACS (Americas) | ID: grc-743033

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION This study aims to evaluate changes in hematological parameters after the follow-up of patients who received treatment with favipiravir due to COVID-19 infections. METHODS Sixty-two cases receiving favipiravir treatment for at least five days due to COVID-19 infection were evaluated retrospectively. Parameters including age, gender, nasopharyngeal swab positivity, and chronic diseases were analyzed. Hematologic parameters were analyzed before and after the treatment. RESULTS The mean age of the patients receiving treatment with favipiravir was 63.7±12.3 years. Nasopharyngeal swab positivity was detected in 67.7%. The most common comorbid conditions detected in patients were hypertension in 25 cases (40.3%) and diabetes in 16 cases (25.8%). In the statistical analysis of the hematological parameters before and after treatment with favipiravir, WBC, PT-PTT-INR levels were found to be unaffected;the mean RBC was found to have decreased from 4.33 ± 0.58 M/uL to 4.16 ± 0.54 M/uL (p:0.003);the median hemoglobin level was found to have decreased from 12.3 g/dl to 11.9 g/dl (p:0.041);the hematocrit level decreased from 38.1% ± 4.8 to 36.9% ± 4.2 (p:0.026);the median neutrophil count decreased from 4.57 K/uL to 3.85 K/uL (p:0.001);the mean lymphocyte count increased from 1.22 ± 0.53 K/uL to 1.84 ± 1.19 K/uL (p:0.000);and the mean platelet count increased from 244.1 ± 85.1 K/uL to 281.9 ± 103.3 K/uL (p:0.005). CONCLUSION We concluded that the pathological effect of treatment with favipiravir on the hematologic system was the suppression in the erythrocyte series, and there were no adverse effects in other hematologic parameters. RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO Este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar as alterações nos parâmetros hematológicos após o acompanhamento de pacientes que receberam tratamento com favipiravir devido à infecção por Covid-19. MÉTODOS Sessenta e dois casos em tratamento com favipiravir por pelo menos cinco dias devido à infecção por Covid-19 foram avaliados retrospectivamente. Parâmetros como idade, sexo, positividade do swab nasofaríngeo e doenças crônicas foram analisados. Os parâmetros hematológicos foram analisados antes e após o tratamento. RESULTADOS A idade média dos pacientes que receberam tratamento com favipiravir foi de 63,7±12,3 anos. A positividade do swab nasofaríngeo foi detectada em 67,7%. As condições comórbidas mais comuns detectadas nos pacientes foram hipertensão em 25 casos (40,3%) e diabetes em 16 casos (25,8%). Na análise estatística dos parâmetros hematológicos antes e após o tratamento com favipiravir, os níveis de leucócitos, PT-PTT-INR não foram afetados. Verificou-se que o RBC médio diminuiu de 4,33±0,58 M/uL para 4,16±0,54 M/uL (p=0,003);o nível médio de hemoglobina foi reduzido de 12,3 g/dl para 11,9 g/dl (p=0,041);o nível de hematócrito diminuiu de 38,1%±4,8 para 36,9%±4,2 (p=0,026);a contagem mediana de neutrófilos diminuiu de 4,57 K/uL para 3,85 K/uL (p=0,001);a contagem média de linfócitos aumentou de 1,22±0,53 K/uL para 1,84±1,19 K/uL (p=0,000);a contagem média de plaquetas aumentou de 244,1±85,1 K/uL para 281,9±103,3 K/uL (p=0,005). CONCLUSÃO Concluiu-se que o efeito patológico do tratamento com favipiravir no sistema hematológico foi a supressão na série eritrocitária e que não houve efeitos adversos em outros parâmetros hematológicos.

19.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 66(Suppl 2):86-90, 2020.
Article in English | LILACS (Americas) | ID: grc-743032

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY AIM The aim of this study is to analyze the prognostic significance of ABO and Rh blood group antigens along with various parameters in patients followed-up with the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHODS We evaluated 397 patients who were follow-up and treated due to COVID-19 infections. The ages, genders, chronic diseases, ABO and Rh blood group antigens, admission rates to Intensive Care Units (ICU), and mortality rates of the patients were analyzed. FINDINGS The mean age of the 397 patients with COVID-19 was 47±17 years. In the blood group analysis of the patients, A Rh-positive (A +) was the most frequently seen blood type (176 patients, 44.3%) followed by O Rh-positive (0 +) (109 patients, 27,5%);38 patients were Rh negative (Rh -) (9,6%). 53 of the patients (13,4%) were followed in ICU and 29 patients died (7,3%). Neither mortality nor admission to ICU was seen for Rh - group. The comparison of Rh groups concerning the need for ICU admission revealed a significantly high rate of ICU admission in the Rh + group (p=0,011), while no significant relationship was found between mortality and Rh antigen (p=0,069). CONCLUSION The most frequently seen blood type among COVID-19 patients was A +. The Rh + blood group was found in all cases who were admitted to ICU and had a death outcome. The Rh + blood group was found in a significantly high number of patients who were admitted to ICU, while no significant relationship was found between mortality and Rh blood group. RESUMO OBJETIVO O objetivo deste estudo é analisar o significado prognóstico dos antígenos do grupo sanguíneo ABO e Rh, juntamente com vários parâmetros em pacientes acompanhados com o diagnóstico de COVID-19. MÉTODOS Foram avaliados 397 pacientes que foram acompanhados e tratados devido à infecção por COVID-19. Foram analisadas as idades, gêneros, doenças crônicas, antígenos do grupo sanguíneo ABO e Rh, taxas de internação em unidades de terapia intensiva (UTI) e taxas de mortalidade dos pacientes. A idade média de 397 pacientes com COVID foi de 47 ± 17 anos. Na análise do grupo sanguíneo dos pacientes, A Rh positivo (A +) foi o tipo sanguíneo mais frequentemente observado (176 dos pacientes, 44,3%), seguido pelo O Rh positivo (0 +) (109 dos pacientes, 27,5%) 38 dos pacientes eram Rh negativos (Rh -) (9,6%). 53 dos pacientes (13,4%) foram acompanhados em UTI e 29 faleceram (7,3%). Não houve mortalidade nem admissão na UTI para o grupo Rh. A comparação dos grupos Rh quanto à necessidade de admissão na UTI revelou uma taxa significativamente alta de admissão na UTI no grupo Rh + (p = 0,011), enquanto não foi encontrada relação significativa entre mortalidade e antígeno Rh (p = 0,069). CONCLUSÃO O tipo sanguíneo mais frequentemente observado foi o A + entre os pacientes com COVID-19. O grupo sanguíneo Rh + foi encontrado em todos os casos admitidos na UTI e com evolução mortal. O grupo sanguíneo Rh + foi encontrado em um número significativamente alto de pacientes internados na UTI, enquanto nenhuma relação significativa foi encontrada entre a mortalidade e o grupo sanguíneo Rh.

20.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 66(9):1258-1263, 2020.
Article in English | LILACS (Americas) | ID: grc-742309

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: This study aims to determine the incidence of de novo nephritic syndrome (NS) in COVID-19 patients and identify its associated factors. METHODS: All ward patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were investigated. After determining the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the study population was identified. The urine dipstick test and urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) measurements were performed. Patients with de novo NS findings, nasopharyngeal swab, and urine RT-PCR tests were performed simultaneously RESULTS: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with 21 patients with COVID-19. The mean age of the patients was 42.2±8.8 years, and 71.4% of them were male. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.4±9.3 days. The urine RT-PCR test was positive in one patient (4.8%). Improvements were observed in hematuria by 71.4%, and proteinuria by 85.7% at the end of the follow-up. A significant decrease in the measured UPCR was found in comparison to the baseline(P=0.000). Also, improvements were recorded in the complete blood counts, inflammatory parameters, ferritin, and coagulation tests, compared to the baseline. There was a positive correlation between baseline UPCR and ferritin, and a negative correlation between baseline UPCR and sodium values CONCLUSION: COVID-19-induced de novo nephritic syndrome may occur mainly due to tubulointerstitial involvement and often results in spontaneous remission. However, why these findings were not present in all patients who had no comorbidities is not clear. RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: Este estudo tem como objetivo determinar a incidência da síndrome nefrítica de novo (SN) em pacientes com COVID-19 e identificar os fatores associados. MÉTODOS: Todos os pacientes da enfermaria com pneumonia por COVID-19 foram investigados. Após a determinação dos critérios de inclusão e exclusão, a população do estudo foi identificada. Foram realizadas medições do teste da vareta da urina e da razão da creatinina das proteínas na urina (UPCR). RESULTADOS: Este estudo transversal descritivo foi realizado com 21 pacientes com COVID-19. A idade média dos pacientes foi de 42,2±8,8 anos e 71,4% dos pacientes eram do sexo masculino. A duração média do seguimento foi de 28,4±9,3 dias. O teste de RT-PCR na urina foi positivo em um paciente (4,8%). Houve melhorias observadas na hematúria em 71,4% e na proteinúria em 85,7% no final do acompanhamento. E uma diminuição significativa na UPCR medida em comparação à linha de base (p=0,000). Além disso, foram registradas melhorias nas contagens sanguíneas completas, nos parâmetros inflamatórios, nos testes de ferritina e de coagulação, comparados aos valores basais. Houve correlação positiva entre UPCR basal e ferritina, e correlação negativa entre os valores basais de UPCR e sódio. CONCLUSÃO: A síndrome nefrítica de novo induzida por COVID-19 pode ocorrer principalmente devido ao envolvimento túbulo-intersticial e frequentemente resulta em remissão espontânea. No entanto, a questão de por que esses achados não se apresentaram em todos os pacientes que não apresentavam condição comórbida não é clara.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL